Language is limited and therefore not adequate to support the existence or lack thereof of a limitless God. Words can easily be manipulated and used in whatever manner is most beneficial for the person communicating. While dictionary definitions are not without their uses, they are incredibly limiting. What if there is no one word to describe what God is or is not? Although these vain word games of supernatural vs. natural vs. supranatural are amusing, they prove nothing. I suggest that this debate would be carried out more effectively through the use of broad concepts.
I am not just making stuff up. However, I have refrained from directly citing a dictionary source becuase I generally believe it to be too narrow. However, if you would like, I will readress your arguments and include dictionary definitions. Expect a second reuttal soon.